(on mac) 1917 full vimeo
full vimeo 1917
; resume: It"s been already three devastating years into the costly World War I, and the Imperial German Army seems to have retreated from their position in the battle-scarred Western Front--an elaborate scheme designed to lure the Allies into a deadly trap. On April 6, 1917--with the lives of 1,600 fellow soldiers hanging by a thread--the best friends and British Army Lance Corporals, Tom Blake and Will Schofield, undertake a peril-laden mission to hand-deliver an urgent, life-saving message to Colonel MacKenzie"s Second Battalion of the Devonshire line infantry regiment. With this in mind, amid the horrors of an uncannily silent no man"s land, the young brothers-in-arms must traverse nine long miles of hostile enemy terrain in the French countryside, to reach the 2nd Devons in time and call off the imminent attack. Now, two ordinary troopers walk into certain death. What makes a true hero?; 2019; directed by: Sam Mendes; Country: Canada; genre: War, Drama
?? ??????????
?? 
?? 
?? ??????????
Yo these “SA accents” they are doing are wild. (on mac) 1997 relatif.
His inspiration was a small time YouTube movie producers movie the hun. watch it and you"ll see what i mean. Man this McDonald"s movie is getting out of hand. Mendes managed to capture the suspense, the intensity, the horror, the madness & the camaraderie of this crazy, horrific episode in time called WW1. I certainly don"t want to spoil anything for anyone who have not seen this movie, but it is, by far, the best war movie in quite some time. YES MY KING FINALLY GETTING THE RECOGNITION HE DESERVES. (on mac) 117. ———————————————————————.
People: 1917 is so creative. What an inventive way of camera work. Birdman. How many WW1 films has Cumberbatch been in now 2? 3 maybe. Because 1917 was a world war and most countries knew what happened, so if you choose the numbers between 1914 - 1918, you can have a good result of the movie, because it was a known year. Pres l"un de l"autre... (on mac) 1997. Imagine being the editor for this, that"d be so hard. We need more ww1 movies. 0:35 Walking through the battlefield. This shows we need more Worl War I movies. With the advent of Iran today, this is a war that needs to be brought back. Because, world war II gets alot of the spotlight, but it is really a rare war where ethics and ideology was the center point. World War I is a war based on what war is usually fought, land, resources, or politics. This needs to be brought back how quickly we can dehumanize each other and how quickly shit can get out of hand and a pointless war breaks out. World War I is a reminder that humans will fight with out ideology and ethics. World War I needs to be remembered, imho more so than World War II.
Video streams (H.264 or H.265) and audio (AC3 / OGG) are usually extracted from iTunes or Amazon Video and then reinstalled into the MKV container without sacrificing quality. Guaranteed Oscar. A technical and visual triumph. Bravo Roger Deakins. Those are the British runner. it runs across the battlefield and give the general a message. and the actors are so good at acting. (on mac) 1987. You need to learn how to say Ypres. (on mac) 1918. Ffs harley quinn trailer is cringe ??. Yep, if you"re tired of watching a bunch of ill disciplined Yankee grunts running around and shooting at everything that moves then watch this.
2:15 ????????. 1917 is definitely a decent movie, and yes, there is no denying that the ambitious "one-take" filming method was very impressive and certainly an achievement, but the writing was paper-thin at times- not as much as Roma was (not that bad) but it had some weaknesses.
Before watching it I glanced through a few reviews, and one in particular that stood out as ambivalent is the one I recalled, as I agreed with the reviewer"s opinion that 1917 has every war movie cliché you could think of.
Literally every cliché is in here as its main scenes, but there is something else I found even more bothersome than that, which is that a few of the scenes are actually dumb. For example, the two messengers witness a dog fight, and they actually identify their allies as winning, but a few moments later the plane they are pursuing is shot down and lands nearby where they are. Rather than play it cautiously, they immediately rush to assist the enemy out of the plane to try to save him. This directly leads to one of them being killed when the pilot stabs the one of them. I mean, what kind of solider in a major war would naively try to save an enemy without their weapons drawn and cautiously? This was very problematic to me.
Another issue that I had once again pertained to suspension of disbelief, or implausibility in that the surviving messenger is shot at constantly throughout his journey with bullets just missing his head on numerous occasion. I mean, this guy has plot armour on him that is thicker than season 8 of Game of Thrones, particularly the episode, The Long Night. Everyone around him is constantly getting blasted by bombs and bullets, yet this guy is just luckily and randomly getting missed. For one scene, I would be like, okay, but this goes on in every battle scene all the way through to the end. I"m not an expert on WWI, but at what point does the viewer have to say, There"s no way this is how it was- that a guy can just expose himself constantly to gunfire, bombs, and hellfire, and not get a scratch on him?
Don"t get me wrong. There is no denying that this was a good movie, but I couldn"t help but feel those three main criticisms: the clichés, the plot armour/suspension of disbelief, and the thin writing. And pertaining to the thin writing, I understand that they needed to give the actors lines, of course, but every single dialogue felt like they had to put "that" kind of scene in to make it feel like a war movie, and that"s not to say it was bad, but just cliched.
Speaking of the writing, if you are a person who mostly enjoys great, original dialogue and style, then you will probably notice this too. However, you will also be unable to deny how impressive the "one-take" filming method is. Another thing to mention is that due to the thin writing, it gave off a very nihilistic vibe a lot of the time. I questioned often if there was any deeper meaning to anything being shown. The reason why is because it seemed like they were going for some depth, but the climaxes were not reaching any moral or lesson. Again, when the pilot was being saved, I thought, okay, he"s showing that in war helping your enemy is noble. but then it results in a nonsensical death, and yet still it wasn"t trying to say not to trust your enemies in war, either; it was just a random event brought about by being stupid by underestimating the pilot in an unprofessional soldier way for a big war.
Finally, I have one other big issue with this. Toward the end, this stranger basically crashes the battalion"s gathering, and he begins asking where the Commander is, okay. Not one single soldier asks him for identification to confirm he isn"t some rabid dog or assassin. They easily trust him and give up the location of their head Commander. But that isn"t all- that is just the very back group he first meets. As he proceeds to chase after the Commander, trained soldiers allow this maniac to just knock them over one by one without being suspicious of him or questioning what his problem is as he advanced through. But it doesn"t even end there; when he arrives at the bunker area, or front line, he continues to ask where the commander is, and the other captains continue to immediately comply with his request, giving up the location of their Commander to a stranger like it is no big deal. Seriously? What if he was an assassin? Nobody asks for his identification or why he wants the Commander"s location. Oh, that is until he finally arrives outside his door. It is finally THEN that they make a big deal about what kind of a threat he can be. I had big problems with how this scene was set up. We"re supposed to believe the Commander of the entire mission is supposed to be that simple and easy to get to when being pursued by an outside low ranking soldier?
On a plus note, I liked the very end and thought most of the movie sufficed as entertaining and a decent watch. However, I would NOT qualify this as a Best Picture favorite at the Academy Awards due to said issues. It had beautiful filming and beautiful shots, but the writing came up cliched and short of what it should require.
-1 (Little character development/thin writing) 9 (Cinematography/One-Take choreography success) 1 (Cliches/Suspension of Disbelief/Plot Armor) 7
7/10.
(on mac) 1978. (on mac) 1987 relatif. 2:17 the caption said father wth. Amo filmes d 1e 2 guerra. Leurs états de santé. I saw this movie on Sunday, and it had me shaking in my seat through the entire movie. Its so good. (on mac) 1914. I love this movie. (on mac) 1971 portant. The Dumbo suit is going to give me nightmares. Reminds me a bit of District 9 and Chappie. 07:58 Gemini Man 2. (on mac. (on mac) 1917. What happened in this movie. Pathfinder: “Im the jump master”. (on mac) 19170.
- seesaawiki.jp/damabuki/d/123movies%20Watch%20Full%20John%20Henry
- cesar-7.jimdosite.com/rakuten-viki-the-lodge-free-movie/
- https://surintara.themedia.jp/posts/8419485
- seesaawiki.jp
- https://www.change.org/o/3078472
- https://seesaawiki.jp/netsubote/d/%A2%E1Movie4k%A2%E1%20Free%20The%20Shawshank%20Redemption
- https://seesaawiki.jp/barabetsu/d/Wonder%20Woman%201984%20Free%20Online%20720p(hd)%20Streaming%201080i(hd)%20No%20Sign%20Up
- seesaawiki.jp/montosa/d/Download%20The%20Lord%20of%20the%20Rings%20The%20Fellowship%20of%20the%20Ring%201080i(hd)%20writers%20J.R
- http://meoticbagsho.unblog.fr/2020/06/09/%e2%9d%9dimdb-tv%e2%9d%9e-full-movie-knives-out/
- https://ameblo.jp/bashiorika/entry-12602997650.html